Friday, 16 June 2017

The Most Fireproof High Rise Design in Response to Grenfell Tower Tragedy

THE MOST FIREPROOF HIGH RISE APARTMENT TOWER BLOCK IN THE WORLD

Following on from the disgraceful and preventable Grenfell Tower fire tragedy in White City, London... I have designed what I believe to be the most fire safe/fire proof high rise/tower apartment block in the world. I believe that 3 or 4 of the 15 or so fireproof design features I have included have never been done before. I am still working on the conceptual diagrams. Within hours of this infuriating tragedy one of the key features came to me, but yesterday yet another life saving feature occurred to me which is relatively cheap in construction. Will governments and councils include these life saving fireproof features or do they want to save money instead of lives? #GrenfellTower #FireproofTowerBlock

Friday, 10 February 2017

ESCAPING CONFORMITY

 ESCAPING CONFORMITY

[conformity club - zayd depaor]

I guess surgery is not the only thing 'cosmetic' in nature today, it seems that so much of what makes up modern society is cosmetic. I think the best way to escape conformity is to question everything and develop a more comprehensive method of thought, judgement and analysis. If someone has fixed principles based on a reasoned foundation, then I don't see them being easily duped, bribed, blackmailed or intertwined into crowd-comfort.



One of the main mental chains keeping people in intellectual, social, political, economic and spiritual slavery is conformism. Blindly following people, crowds, society, governments, media, education, ideology and individual concepts and ideas.

Conformity is often born out of cowardice, being unwilling to differ with the majority, fearing you will be isolated or victimized.

Conformity is also born out of intellectual laziness, copying others is easier than actually thinking and evaluating ideas.

Conformity can also be born out of dissident voices being silenced by government or locked out by the mainstream media. People only hear one tune being sung at them all day and night, so it is the only music they know of. We are all used to pantomime phony debates, that are presented to us in the mainstream. The establishment view being well represented and the opposition being a weak representative or in reality not being a genuine or credible opponent.

Conformity is dangerous to an individual and society as it strips the individual of intellectual independence and the society of variety, critical analysis and individual input and creativity. Conformity creates drones, slaves, server units of an elite. The public mind becomes monopolized by the few directors of ideas.

Conformity leads to the oppression of the mind, body and spirit. Conformity breeds conformity, every instance of delegating thought to others acclimatizes the brain to not thinking, so it becomes more difficult to think the next time it is required.

All the mess we see around us is usually because people conformed and collaborated with oppressive and autocratic structures. People conform to bad ideas, false beliefs, nonsense concepts, misguided ideology and artificial knowledge and then wonder why the political, economic and social conditions are failing and destructive.

To escape this conformity to chaos requires stepping aside from the downward spiral and viewing reality as it is, away from the spin, without a blinkered view. We should ask ourselves whether things make sense, are they rationally sound, where is the benefit, where is the evidence? We should question our own motives and relationships, what are we doing? Are our thoughts our own or are they just harmful, malicious implants? The media is owned by who with what agenda? The education is mapped by who for what? The fashions and fads are being driven by who on the basis of what? The slogans being circulated, do they make sense, are they true? The common concepts that people are clinging to, are they in accordance with reality or fantasy? Are the foundations and branches of society sound, coherent, clear and correct or baseless, contradictory, confused and erroneous?

Wednesday, 8 February 2017

illegitimate Star Wars prequels and sequels


A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away...filmmakers changed their minds and ruined their stories... recently, in a world very close to home.

Only the original unedited first three Star Wars movies are legitimate Star Wars.... all the other prequels and sequels are illegitimate and phony.

 As for those who think they are legitimate, genuine and authentic, then they are wrong. They show they do not have artistic, filmmaking, cinematic, narrative-coherent, integrated-visionary judgement...they are just consumers. People can like what they want, but only the original three films are legitimate. I only watched 20 mins of the first prequel and rightly boycotted the rest of the commercial, social engineering, populist distortion. They can fool some of the people but not all of the people.

You can't start changing the whole character, culture and technology of a story after you have told it.

You can't start changing scenes after you have announced, advertised and presented them.

Sure, you can make alternate versions with these cuts and remakes, but to eliminate the original history of the story, the original vision that people held in their minds, emotions and memories...to be replaced with some fashionable, artifically forged, rubbish? No.

Changing original movies and eliminating the original vision is one act of destructive butchery. Another act of fabricated inauthentic nonsense is when you make prequels and sequels that betray the nature, culture, coherence, integrity and vision of the original story. You can't say "The world is like this, a supernatural horror or sci-fi war between tradition and corrupted modernity, step inside..." and then later down the line, say "I've changed my mind, now we are in a cowboy comedy or a party political broadcast for the socially corrupt, morally degenerate party." If you want to do that, then just become a politician, be part of the government education system or work for the mainstream media in the sphere of political and social commentary.

How about if song writers, musicians and composers start eliminating their original published versions, changing both the meaning and the sound in some new concoction which retains the same title?

How about if two people get married and after the wedding reception, contract, vows and marriage ceremony, the husband says to the wife, "What I mean now is that you are not a wife but a house maid?"

When a filmmaker releases a movie to the public, not to a preliminary test audience before the movie is completed, he is making a contract with the viewer. He is effectively saying, I want to take you on a journey in a world I have crafted, do you want to come with me? Do you want to accept and be part of what I show you? Do you want this to be part of your conceptual tapestry, your cultural experience, your artistic, psychological and emotional memory? Do you accept this to be part of your social and experiential background? They then accept and watch it and the movie becomes part of their history and a socio-cultural reference point, it may well be a basis for important conceptual allegories and symbolism they may draw upon in the wider world.

So on the basis of that heavy mental implant being accepted, the viewer, the observer, wants to relive the story again, perhaps to share the experience, message and key moments with a new audience. And then he finds the key scenes missing or changed. His trust has been betrayed, history has been wiped, the vision has been smashed and the trance broken.

You are sitting with your wife, friends or children, wanting to show and share with them an experience and suddenly you find yourself robbed. Where the hell did this scene go? Who the hell corrupted the vision? Who has vandalized this story? This is unforgivable, what is this rubbish?

If you do this as a filmmaker, as a director or whatever, then you will no longer be trusted. Your next movie, you want people to buy into it? You want them to have confidence in this story or is that just some experimental junk which you will play with after you sold it? No, you will be just be regarded as a cheat now, a liar, a fraud. You are not a filmmaker but a story breaker.

If an audience accepts this sort of thing then they themselves do not understand the cinematic experience, they don't understand the necessary coherence and continuity of story telling. If they accept this then they are in fact illegitimate viewers, they are invalid spectators, they are inwardly deaf, dumb and blind. They are probably the sort of people who like to see a trailer before a movie or listen to a critic's review before seeing the movie themselves.

And as for all those new 'actors' in the recent illegitimate star wars prequels and sequels who think they are part of the Star Wars world...Sorry, you are not part of it, you are just part of some fabricated counterfeit commercial joke.

IDIOCY OF THE PLASTIC BAG CHARGE


10 Reasons Why the 5p Bag Charge is Idiotic

1) It hits the poorest in society the hardest, those who have less resources to ruin the environment with

2) Reusable Bags are a haven for Bacteria, not a good idea for your fresh food

3) Plastic Bags were used as bin liners, now people will just be buying more bin liners

4) Plastic bags had many uses and were cheap or free to apply to those uses, now the payment has to be made...they will be less available and there will in fact be less recycling in relation to those extra uses and other resources will be used. Perhaps the park drunks who at least gathered their litter into one bag and placed it in the recycle bin will now instead leave their litter scattered everywhere and it wont get recycled

5) The bag charge hits those who pollute less, cyclists and pedestrians who need more bags because they are actually carrying them over a distance rather than lifting them from their trolley to their heavily polluting car. All the car drivers are not complaining about the charge as they don't carry the bags any distance anyway.

6) A poor person doing a family shop may need 12-16 plastic bags in one shop to do the shopping as bags may need to be doubled and tripled and they don't hold much anyway. 80p added to a shopping budget means 80p less for food or any other necessities. The idiotic politicians, who often don't do their own shopping and have no idea about counting pennies, as they have high salaries paid by public taxes before setting themselves up in high paying jobs due to their government insider-info, are unaware that the "5p wont break the bank" is actually false. It is not 5p a year or even a week, but on every unit needed, every shopping trip and every transaction necessary. It can be a significant charge on the poor, or even on the rich man who didn't consider the bag charge who is out of cash.

7) A poor person may only have £1 on them for a few items...but now they need the bag or bags also to be paid for, this may mean they go home without shopping as they didn't have the money for the bags. Many people are so poor that they only have small change on them.

8) Pedestrians and cyclists now have to take up their carriage space or pockets with plastic carrier bags... This may deter them from eco-friendly travel, they might take bus, car, train or taxi instead.

9) People will have less money to spend on eco-friendly products.

10) Precious time is wasted messing around with packed bags and with additional bag-charge transactions, this is a drain on more resources and costs the economy more.

Thursday, 12 May 2016

Cosmetic Surgery Manipulation


Many women have been mind controlled into cosmetic surgery. It is economic, cultural, social and psychological manipulation...and it damages you long term, and you delete and mutilate part of yourself. If groups, individuals and cultures demand distorting your nature, modifying yourself to conform to some false, plastic ideal...then abandon those groups and individuals in favour of those who appreciate nature and purity free from socially engineered shallow conformist fabricated images. Instead of vandalizing yourself associate with those who appreciate your original form and nature and are not mind-controlled and impressed by fakery.

Does a healthy minded individual really attracted to a living Barbie doll or blow up doll who has had every body part modified to meet some juvenile image and ideal of beauty?

It takes all sorts to make a world and we were not manufactured in moulds churned out on a factory conveyor belt. Why would anyone want a society made up of carbon-copy women?

Endless cases of naturally beautiful women destroying themselves by trying to look like some other unnatural and unappealing image. People manipulating their bone structures until they crumble into an inhuman looking mess.

We are in trouble as we have allowed ourselves to be misled, misdirected by false authorities, experts and commentators. Led down the sewers and garbage alleys by clueless and corrupted role models and going with the flow down the toilet with wandering and commercially enslaved crowd of empty vessels making all the wrong noises.

It is a sad state of affairs when people's tastes have been narrowed into toxic self-strangulation and their aesthetic appreciation been bent to conform with an industry standard of the lowest common denominator, an even sadder state of affairs when people feel pressured to undergo medical procedures to fit in with that which could never fit or be accepted by the most unsophisticated, uncivilized, unintelligent and shallow sections of society. 


Don't try and fix what isn't broken.

Tuesday, 10 May 2016

The Need for Privacy - Refutation of Surveillance State Supporters

There is a very large section of the public socially engineered and indoctrinated not only by worship of the State and it's ideology but also some of it's more obvious subjugating concepts.

After every act of terrorism (of course not including the massive State terrorism which murders thousands of people every year, unnamed foreigners who enjoy no public ritual mourning, minute's silence etc), the State seeks to enact further means of control and surveillance of it's own citizens. After every tragedy, more laws are needed, tighter controls, more expansive powers for the intelligence and security services. All of the dozens or hundreds of sources of information on the public need to be collected in one place so the government and its security and military machinery can exercise a penetrative insight and judgement on every one of it's citizens who are 'suspected' of having 'extreme' or 'radical' views. 

So despite, the claim by the establishment, its indoctrination arm of State education and it's cheerleaders in the mainstream media that we live in a society with freedom of thought, information, politics, expression, association, speech and belief, it turns out none of those are true. 

The State, the establishment, judges you according to its own beliefs and interests. It has decided that which is extreme (even if it can not define it), that which is acceptable, moderate (and indeed it has decided that you must be moderate, unless it is in a sphere whose extremities the State desires) and ideal. The State has its own view of each religion. The State has not only decided that you must follow that which is orthodox but it has defined orthodoxy. That is right, the supposedly secular State has its own judgement on religious matters and has decided which interpretation you must follow, even if it's own judgement manifestly conflicts with the actual sources and classical authorities for that particular religion.

The State has decided what political direction you can move in and has decided how far you can walk. The State has decided that you must not ask certain questions but you must repeat particular slogans over and over until you are a happy submissive follower of them which an instant emotional hostile reaction to anyone who questions, let alone opposes them.

The State has its own view of history, which must be taught and there is no allowance for divergent or conflicting interpretations and sources. You are free to obey the State and follow its ideology in anyway you want. You are free to engage in political acts that the State has set up and facilitated for you, you can speak in favour of any mainstream party and you are free to watch any televised political debate where all opponents have the same ideology and accept the same system. Be grateful you don't live in a dictatorship, be grateful you are not being tortured and be grateful you engage in any of the perversions that government ministers engage in. Therefore, sign up for your voluntary Identity card, submit your data, trust the security services, police and politicians who are doing this all for you and be pleased you are not living in a rogue State.

Amongst the slogans which facilitate this docile, collective public mentality are "Only criminals need fear the law", "Increased powers of the security apparatus will only target the terrorists and serious criminals", "I have nothing to hide so it doesn't affect me" etc. The general populace becomes mobilized behind a drive for ever more intrusion into personal electronic communications, everything must be recorded, saved for many years 'for our security.' All of our transactions, movements, conversations, relationships must be gathered and analyzed, and most important of all our political and religious views must be monitored, especially when they are in opposition to anything the political elite and their corporate and ideological collaborators are seeking to propagate.

The idiotic stance of those happy to be monitored, observed, analyzed, supposedly in the name of 'freedom', ludicrously tied to supporting phrases such as 'We need freedom but we need freedom to live first' (i.e. abandon all your freedoms so the government can supposedly monitor you and those who are planning to kill you) is summed up by the much parroted mantra, 'We have no problem with the surveillance State, as we have nothing to hide."

So let us offer a little resistance to that ever touted hymn that so many are blindly and ignorantly singing:-

  1. I'm not the property of the State and the State doesn't own the country...it is indoctrination which leads to the acceptance of that enslaving idea.
  2. A private and public sphere of activity is natural, as the physical reality necessitates it. There are things we display in public and things we do not, due to the appropriateness of the nature of the activity.
  3. Private and Public life/activities/individuals/organizations benefit from the existence of the other. When the line between these is removed, both suffer from the other's absence. 
  4. There is no rational reason why all people should be perceptively connected to all other individuals at the same time...it is also an impossibility.
  5. Society is not one homogeneous unified entity...it consists of individuals and groups of conflicting beliefs, interests and motives.... thus, there is no reason to serve my opponents by informing them of all of my plans and activities. If you have some serious thoughts, values, principles and objectives, you certainly don't want to expose all to those individuals, groups and institutions who have declared by word or acts their malicious intent in opposing them.
  6. You may feel secure and immune today from oppression and persecution (due to your 'presumed' innocence and 'favourable and acceptable views and activities) but this may well not be the case tomorrow. Through no fault of your own nor by any change in your own behaviour you may well find yourself designated as a suspect, criminal, extremist, enemy of the State or 'enemy of freedom' etc. The government regularly invents new crimes and criminals in order to serve its own agenda, and any group in society can do that too, as indeed happens.
  7. Many aspects of private life are harmful to others when exposed.  
  8. Not all people are worthy of knowing all things all of the time.
  9. Many people are harmed by what they don't understand.
  10. Many people can't accurately judge what is presented before them due to hasty judgement and societal conditioning. This is quickly turned into public trial by media, where there is no debate, defence or common sense.
  11. Privacy serves purposes of efficiency, too many cooks spoil the broth, and we don't want to keep returning to lesson one, for late comers.
  12. You may have nothing to hide, but those observing you are hiding much from you.
  13. You may be perfectly open about your own motives, but those seeking further control on you are not perfectly open about their motives as even their own news and history proves.
  14. Once you allow yourself to be handcuffed to the throne of your master, you can't stop him putting further shackles upon you and after that doing whatever he desires.
  15. You maybe happy to abandon all your privacy and freedom to your current master, in your folly, but you don't know whether you can tolerate the excesses of his successor.
  16. Man does not consist of segregated compartments, you allow yourself to be exposed and controlled under one banner of security, while unknowingly giving the identical mandate to your 'benevolent overseers' economically, socially, intellectually, culturally and ideologically. You offered them a hand and they took both arms, legs, heart and head.
  17. Once you lift the veil, you lift it on everything, you can't tell your government worshipping observer, "Look this way only." 
  18. The government, it's departments, operatives and enforcers are not populated by altruistic, ethical, neutral individuals free from malicious intent, greed, grudge, prejudice, cowardice and disloyalty (they are even disloyal to those they swore oaths to and signed contracts with). Even if the imaginary ideal perception of the State and it's driving political parties were true, it's own materialistic ideology along with its collaborative culture of individualism ensures that the individuals within it are in conflict with its own official protocol and public spin. They are already cheating, but they even cheat at cheating, just as they lie about their lies.
  19. On a less theoretical note, consider the spectacular achievements of indoctrination and mind-control when people willingly support increased powers of observation, spying, control and immunity for an entity whose own record define it as a mass murdering, serial-lying, self-preserving, self-serving, thieving, plundering, deceiving, opponent-torturing, defrauding, enslaving obstacle to truth and progress. 
  20. When you build an impregnable cage, you might find it useful to check that you are not inside it.

We can make this list very long, but I think the case is already clearly made. I don't want the government in my private affairs and space unless I explicitly invite them, and neither should you. They are quite strict and aggressive in preventing anyone from uncovering and scrutinizing their own private interests and plots.
  
We are by consent, collaboration and ignorant self-deception allowing ourselves to be profiled in all spheres and directions so that we can be manipulated economically, socially, culturally, politically and ideologically. They see us while we don't see them, they know about us what they are not willing to reveal about themselves. Our information is open to the highest bidder. Whatever needs to be fabricated about us can be constructed as a fact for the public mind. The whole country and world for that mater, has become a giant prison under 24 hour surveillance. Who is overlooking the overseers? Only those who scripted the project in the first place. We live in a cross between a zoo and a mental asylum, and if we get out of line we need to be injected with our big pharma pills, and they know exactly the medicine we need, they have been checking our reactions as we swallow for a long time.

Monday, 9 May 2016

Why Slapped? Cause & Effect in International Relations


 Why Slapped? Cause & Effect in International Relations

One of the best ways for a country to avoid its own citizens being bombed is not to bomb civilians in other countries, but the mainstream media, global governments and most people on social media seem not to understand that very rudimentary point. 

If people still struggle to grasp it, all they need to do is ask themselves about the immediate blood lust vengeance bombing campaigns that follow from their own government after their country has been on the receiving end of some retaliation. How does it go? Like this, "Well we have just been bombed so we are coming to your country to bomb lots of people, whoever they are, as we have to satisfy the anger of our own people for some deaths, at least triple the amount of people we have lost and we also need to make sure that people realize WE have the monopoly on killing and weapons of mass destruction in the world." 

I keep on slapping a little kid every day, I steal his money every day, I keep him in chains, I torment him, I call him names and spread lies about him, I appoint the class bully to watch over him and organize his affairs, I forbid him from speaking or complaining, I also kill all his friends and family...and one day the kid slaps me back....but I am baffled why I got slapped....it must be that he is jealous of my new shoes and doesn't like the way I comb my hair.