Endless Chores - poem - text

ENDLESS CHORES

------------

Endless Chores,
No Applause,

Brush Teeth,
Pain Beneath,

Take Shower,
Dwindling Power,

Take Pills,
Not for Thrills,

Time to Cook,
Can't write Book,

Do the Shopping,
Patience Popping,

Wheel the Cart,
Unfinished Art,

Wait in Queues,
Make sure I Lose,

Tidy Up,
Can't win the Cup,

Wash the Dishes,
No time for Wishes,

Unclean Clothes,
Broken Oaths,

Find my Keys,
Memory Disease,

Got to Travel,
Hopes Unravel,

Teach the Class,
Ceiling of Glass,

Cook Again,
Feel more Pain,

Recycle Cans,
Hinders Plans,

Plumbing Issue,
Time, I miss You,

Feeling Sick,
Finish work Quick,

Bones now Creaking,
Life needs Tweaking,

Charge the Phone,
Unhealthy Tone,

Round and Round,
All Unsound,

Problem Availed,
Iv'e still Failed,

More Routine,
I'm stuck Between

Had no Sleep,
Can't count Sheep,

Things are Rough,
I've had Enough,

Changing Nappy,
Baby Happy.

[Zayd Depaor - The World's No.1 Artist, Writer,
Poet & King of Rock n Roll of the Underworld]

ENDLESS CHORES - Poem

Rendition of Threes (poem)

 

RENDITION OF THREES (poem)

-------------------------------

Peas begot Glee,

Tea caused Wee,

Pay my Fee,

Don't cheat Thee,

She isn't Me,

See the Tree,

Mend my Knee,

Stung by Bee,

Two, not Three,

Not named Lee,

Hold the Key,

You're not Free,

'F' before 'G',

Smarter than Ye.

[Zayd Depaor, the world's No.1 Writer, Poet, Artist & King of Rock n Roll of the Underworld]

AIDA - Who, what and where is this Aida?

AIDA - Who, what and where is this Aida?

Sam Raimi Exposed - Evil Dead taken from 1950's Horror Comic

Successful Idiot

STARING REALITY IN THE MIRROR - Perception, Belief & Reality

Belief can be either emotional, based on feelings, conjecture, blind following etc or it can be intellectual, based on rational thought, evidence.
Reality exists, but your perception is subject to doubt, but the existence of reality is not subject to doubt. God either exists or does not exist...that is a rational fact (in fact for those who engage in rational thought the existence of God is a rational fact)... There is a knock at your door...you can't see who or what is making the knock... It is a rational fact that something is making the knock, unless it is your mistaken perception, mishearing...but even that will have a cause also, as causality is a rational fact. People have their beliefs and perceptions but external to all of that is the truth, objective reality... So the discovery of that will not just be based on perception but rational thought, as rational thought can eliminate or affirm what is beyond the limits of perception, outside of it's scope and free from it's delusions and errors.
Your denial of the reality does not stop it existing and your ignorance of the reality does not stop it existing and your perception or knowledge of it's existence is not the cause of it's existence. One person believes God exists and another person denies that God exists, they can't both be right, due to the principle of non-contradiction... Two things which nullify the reality of one another can not coexist in the same instant. You are either alive or dead, you can not be both, unless you are talking metaphorically or referring to different attributes or using different definitions or meanings.
If people were to use rational thought to establish their beliefs they would not arrive at such false beliefs or doubtful ones. It is amazing that people use rational thought in their daily lives for trivial matters but they abandon it for the most important matters and are happy with following social-media slogans, conjecture, emotions, fashion, populist idiocy, uninformed commentators, false authority and imagination.

My video on clarity might help a little:-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uGz3YQI5Qi0

DESTRUCTIVE DRUG ABUSE

There is a large trend in public office, government, the judiciary, law enforcement, the new age movement and the wider public towards legalization of drugs and a soft approach on drug use or abuse.

This move has come after decades of mass manufacture of all sorts of drugs and a general failure to prevent drug dealing, addiction and drug related crime... It has been taken as a collective attribute of the human condition, with it's problems.

Many proponents of legalization state the problems with existing policy and promote the benefits of drug use or the move towards a more tolerant drug taking culture. This has gained popular support of course with the many drug users and addicts in society as well as some victims of drug use and crime who don't see way forward in existing policies and can't think of better alternatives.

This though does not mean better alternatives don't exist, on the macro and the micro level. On a philosophical level, we should ask why so many people in society want to escape their present reality by turning to drugs. 

Mass drug abuse points to deeper problems in the culture, ideology and foundations of a society and civilization, it points to problems in the social, economic, educational and cultural norms and systems of a society. On the level of the resultant crime and disorder stemming from drug addiction and other matters it points to political, judicial and law enforcement failings... it doesn't mean necessarily that the concept of prohibiting drug abuse is incorrect.

Once people jump on a bandwagon for a particular trend they will readily propagate a list of benefits... But they should consider all the harms that exist already in association with it, as well as those harms that are likely to arise with further facilitating it.

The Most Fireproof High Rise Design in Response to Grenfell Tower Tragedy

THE MOST FIREPROOF HIGH RISE APARTMENT TOWER BLOCK IN THE WORLD

Following on from the disgraceful and preventable Grenfell Tower fire tragedy in White City, London... I have designed what I believe to be the most fire safe/fire proof high rise/tower apartment block in the world. I believe that 3 or 4 of the 15 or so fireproof design features I have included have never been done before. I am still working on the conceptual diagrams. Within hours of this infuriating tragedy one of the key features came to me, but yesterday yet another life saving feature occurred to me which is relatively cheap in construction. Will governments and councils include these life saving fireproof features or do they want to save money instead of lives? #GrenfellTower #FireproofTowerBlock

ESCAPING CONFORMITY

 ESCAPING CONFORMITY

[conformity club - zayd depaor]

I guess surgery is not the only thing 'cosmetic' in nature today, it seems that so much of what makes up modern society is cosmetic. I think the best way to escape conformity is to question everything and develop a more comprehensive method of thought, judgement and analysis. If someone has fixed principles based on a reasoned foundation, then I don't see them being easily duped, bribed, blackmailed or intertwined into crowd-comfort.



One of the main mental chains keeping people in intellectual, social, political, economic and spiritual slavery is conformism. Blindly following people, crowds, society, governments, media, education, ideology and individual concepts and ideas.

Conformity is often born out of cowardice, being unwilling to differ with the majority, fearing you will be isolated or victimized.

Conformity is also born out of intellectual laziness, copying others is easier than actually thinking and evaluating ideas.

Conformity can also be born out of dissident voices being silenced by government or locked out by the mainstream media. People only hear one tune being sung at them all day and night, so it is the only music they know of. We are all used to pantomime phony debates, that are presented to us in the mainstream. The establishment view being well represented and the opposition being a weak representative or in reality not being a genuine or credible opponent.

Conformity is dangerous to an individual and society as it strips the individual of intellectual independence and the society of variety, critical analysis and individual input and creativity. Conformity creates drones, slaves, server units of an elite. The public mind becomes monopolized by the few directors of ideas.

Conformity leads to the oppression of the mind, body and spirit. Conformity breeds conformity, every instance of delegating thought to others acclimatizes the brain to not thinking, so it becomes more difficult to think the next time it is required.

All the mess we see around us is usually because people conformed and collaborated with oppressive and autocratic structures. People conform to bad ideas, false beliefs, nonsense concepts, misguided ideology and artificial knowledge and then wonder why the political, economic and social conditions are failing and destructive.

To escape this conformity to chaos requires stepping aside from the downward spiral and viewing reality as it is, away from the spin, without a blinkered view. We should ask ourselves whether things make sense, are they rationally sound, where is the benefit, where is the evidence? We should question our own motives and relationships, what are we doing? Are our thoughts our own or are they just harmful, malicious implants? The media is owned by who with what agenda? The education is mapped by who for what? The fashions and fads are being driven by who on the basis of what? The slogans being circulated, do they make sense, are they true? The common concepts that people are clinging to, are they in accordance with reality or fantasy? Are the foundations and branches of society sound, coherent, clear and correct or baseless, contradictory, confused and erroneous?

illegitimate Star Wars prequels and sequels

A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away...filmmakers changed their minds and ruined their stories... recently, in a world very close to home.

Only the original unedited first three Star Wars movies are legitimate Star Wars.... all the other prequels and sequels are illegitimate and phony.

 As for those who think they are legitimate, genuine and authentic, then they are wrong. They show they do not have artistic, filmmaking, cinematic, narrative-coherent, integrated-visionary judgement...they are just consumers. People can like what they want, but only the original three films are legitimate. I only watched 20 mins of the first prequel and rightly boycotted the rest of the commercial, social engineering, populist distortion. They can fool some of the people but not all of the people.

You can't start changing the whole character, culture and technology of a story after you have told it.

You can't start changing scenes after you have announced, advertised and presented them.

Sure, you can make alternate versions with these cuts and remakes, but to eliminate the original history of the story, the original vision that people held in their minds, emotions and memories...to be replaced with some fashionable, artifically forged, rubbish? No.

Changing original movies and eliminating the original vision is one act of destructive butchery. Another act of fabricated inauthentic nonsense is when you make prequels and sequels that betray the nature, culture, coherence, integrity and vision of the original story. You can't say "The world is like this, a supernatural horror or sci-fi war between tradition and corrupted modernity, step inside..." and then later down the line, say "I've changed my mind, now we are in a cowboy comedy or a party political broadcast for the socially corrupt, morally degenerate party." If you want to do that, then just become a politician, be part of the government education system or work for the mainstream media in the sphere of political and social commentary.

How about if song writers, musicians and composers start eliminating their original published versions, changing both the meaning and the sound in some new concoction which retains the same title?

How about if two people get married and after the wedding reception, contract, vows and marriage ceremony, the husband says to the wife, "What I mean now is that you are not a wife but a house maid?"

When a filmmaker releases a movie to the public, not to a preliminary test audience before the movie is completed, he is making a contract with the viewer. He is effectively saying, I want to take you on a journey in a world I have crafted, do you want to come with me? Do you want to accept and be part of what I show you? Do you want this to be part of your conceptual tapestry, your cultural experience, your artistic, psychological and emotional memory? Do you accept this to be part of your social and experiential background? They then accept and watch it and the movie becomes part of their history and a socio-cultural reference point, it may well be a basis for important conceptual allegories and symbolism they may draw upon in the wider world.

So on the basis of that heavy mental implant being accepted, the viewer, the observer, wants to relive the story again, perhaps to share the experience, message and key moments with a new audience. And then he finds the key scenes missing or changed. His trust has been betrayed, history has been wiped, the vision has been smashed and the trance broken.

You are sitting with your wife, friends or children, wanting to show and share with them an experience and suddenly you find yourself robbed. Where the hell did this scene go? Who the hell corrupted the vision? Who has vandalized this story? This is unforgivable, what is this rubbish?

If you do this as a filmmaker, as a director or whatever, then you will no longer be trusted. Your next movie, you want people to buy into it? You want them to have confidence in this story or is that just some experimental junk which you will play with after you sold it? No, you will be just be regarded as a cheat now, a liar, a fraud. You are not a filmmaker but a story breaker.

If an audience accepts this sort of thing then they themselves do not understand the cinematic experience, they don't understand the necessary coherence and continuity of story telling. If they accept this then they are in fact illegitimate viewers, they are invalid spectators, they are inwardly deaf, dumb and blind. They are probably the sort of people who like to see a trailer before a movie or listen to a critic's review before seeing the movie themselves.

And as for all those new 'actors' in the recent illegitimate star wars prequels and sequels who think they are part of the Star Wars world...Sorry, you are not part of it, you are just part of some fabricated counterfeit commercial joke.

IDIOCY OF THE PLASTIC BAG CHARGE

10 Reasons Why the 5p Bag Charge is Idiotic

1) It hits the poorest in society the hardest, those who have less resources to ruin the environment with

2) Reusable Bags are a haven for Bacteria, not a good idea for your fresh food

3) Plastic Bags were used as bin liners, now people will just be buying more bin liners

4) Plastic bags had many uses and were cheap or free to apply to those uses, now the payment has to be made...they will be less available and there will in fact be less recycling in relation to those extra uses and other resources will be used. Perhaps the park drunks who at least gathered their litter into one bag and placed it in the recycle bin will now instead leave their litter scattered everywhere and it wont get recycled

5) The bag charge hits those who pollute less, cyclists and pedestrians who need more bags because they are actually carrying them over a distance rather than lifting them from their trolley to their heavily polluting car. All the car drivers are not complaining about the charge as they don't carry the bags any distance anyway.

6) A poor person doing a family shop may need 12-16 plastic bags in one shop to do the shopping as bags may need to be doubled and tripled and they don't hold much anyway. 80p added to a shopping budget means 80p less for food or any other necessities. The idiotic politicians, who often don't do their own shopping and have no idea about counting pennies, as they have high salaries paid by public taxes before setting themselves up in high paying jobs due to their government insider-info, are unaware that the "5p wont break the bank" is actually false. It is not 5p a year or even a week, but on every unit needed, every shopping trip and every transaction necessary. It can be a significant charge on the poor, or even on the rich man who didn't consider the bag charge who is out of cash.

7) A poor person may only have £1 on them for a few items...but now they need the bag or bags also to be paid for, this may mean they go home without shopping as they didn't have the money for the bags. Many people are so poor that they only have small change on them.

8) Pedestrians and cyclists now have to take up their carriage space or pockets with plastic carrier bags... This may deter them from eco-friendly travel, they might take bus, car, train or taxi instead.

9) People will have less money to spend on eco-friendly products.

10) Precious time is wasted messing around with packed bags and with additional bag-charge transactions, this is a drain on more resources and costs the economy more.

Cosmetic Surgery Manipulation

Many women have been mind controlled into cosmetic surgery. It is economic, cultural, social and psychological manipulation...and it damages you long term, and you delete and mutilate part of yourself. If groups, individuals and cultures demand distorting your nature, modifying yourself to conform to some false, plastic ideal...then abandon those groups and individuals in favour of those who appreciate nature and purity free from socially engineered shallow conformist fabricated images. Instead of vandalizing yourself associate with those who appreciate your original form and nature and are not mind-controlled and impressed by fakery.

Does a healthy minded individual really attracted to a living Barbie doll or blow up doll who has had every body part modified to meet some juvenile image and ideal of beauty?

It takes all sorts to make a world and we were not manufactured in moulds churned out on a factory conveyor belt. Why would anyone want a society made up of carbon-copy women?

Endless cases of naturally beautiful women destroying themselves by trying to look like some other unnatural and unappealing image. People manipulating their bone structures until they crumble into an inhuman looking mess.

We are in trouble as we have allowed ourselves to be misled, misdirected by false authorities, experts and commentators. Led down the sewers and garbage alleys by clueless and corrupted role models and going with the flow down the toilet with wandering and commercially enslaved crowd of empty vessels making all the wrong noises.

It is a sad state of affairs when people's tastes have been narrowed into toxic self-strangulation and their aesthetic appreciation been bent to conform with an industry standard of the lowest common denominator, an even sadder state of affairs when people feel pressured to undergo medical procedures to fit in with that which could never fit or be accepted by the most unsophisticated, uncivilized, unintelligent and shallow sections of society. 

Don't try and fix what isn't broken.

Global Enslavement Scam of the 'Unsolicited Submissions Policy'

The Global Enslavement Scam of the 'Unsolicited Submissions Policy'

Have you ever had a good idea you considered worthy of selling? To implement the idea yourself was too much hassle, too much work, too much time you don't have, too personally expensive or possibly too much risk for your budget.

You couldn't do it alone but thought there are many individuals, organizations or companies who do have the physical and human resources to bring the idea to fruition. So you could sell the idea to the company at a fixed ratio of net profit or a fixed price, then they could run away with it. This should be simple right? You have the idea, they have the money, the infrastructure, the contacts, distribution, marketing and know-how, so you will both win. They get richer and you get rich or richer than you are. So what is the problem?

Obviously there is a problem with people thinking they have a unique idea when they don't. There is another problem with people not having an idea any where near as good as they think it is, or perhaps it is patently bad, dumb, unworkable or nonsensical. How will a company filter all the ideas it receives, when it could be many ideas per day? And what is the point of the R & D, marketing departments and brainstorming sessions if a stranger will be made rich to the exclusion of those who are regularly paid to create and develop ideas?

You will regularly hear expert 'Intellectual Property' lawyers tell you, "Ideas are a dime a dozen", "Ideas aren't worth the paper they are written on", "Unless you have a patented prototype then forget it" etc. But the reality is that IDEAS RESULT IN WEALTH and there is NO WEALTH IN TRADE WITHOUT IDEAS. So with any new super selling product, innovation or service being based on an idea then why all of the deterrent measures to put you off trying to sell your idea? 

Are companies really telling us, "We don't want your ideas as we know everything already!", "We don't want your ideas as we know they will be bad or old before we even look at them", "We don't need your good ideas as we are rich enough and are not hungry for more success and sales!", "We don't need your idea as our in-house thinkers are better than everyone else and will do what we need, whether they think of your idea or not!" Do all those replies sound like nonsense and falsehood? Indeed they are. If we look at the behaviour of large corporations we can see that they are busy in all ways trying to gain an edge on components and a stronger grip of the minds and pockets of their customers and potential customers. They also know that success is based on ideas. There is indeed a growing underground industry of corporate espionage and if ideas were so worthless, there wouldn't be a million internal company workshops on getting the creative sparks flying, not to mention the multi-billion dollar intellectual property law industry. So why are they apparently fobbing you off, they really don't want your idea if it is a unique and good one?

Well, the current situation needs a little reading in to, so you can see what is really happening...and sadly and expectedly it isn't too good for the common man, and it kind of goes along the same pattern and path as his relationship with dictatorial government which usurps and monopolizes all sorts or rights and materials in the society, his relationship with utility companies, banks, property rents and the like... "We have the guns so we make the rules, we hold the gold, so we dictate how little access you have to it." To be more precise...

You may have found the large corporation, that fits your idea perfectly, you see it helping them and them helping you, so you run a search on how to submit your idea to them and then you come across the 'UNSOLICITED SUBMISSIONS POLICY' And this is where your blindfold about the way the world is gets taken off.

When you run a search for that term or similar, then you find it is not only your own target company which has such a policy but all competitors whom you may have considered as alternatives and all industries too. That's right, the 'Unsolicited Submissions Policy' has popped up across all corporations. Why? Because we are not dealing with independent companies but oligarchies or cartels. Have a look at the list of board of directors, that's right you saw them on the board of that other company, and that other one too. What does this policy say? Basically:-

1) Thanks for being our customer...that's all you are, we don't want to actually fulfil some of the rhetoric in our supposed 'company philosophy' and marketing slogans. You are there to make US rich, our relationship does not extend to helping you get rich in any way.

2) If you want to get rich from your idea, then you are dreaming. We are making this legal document before even speaking to you, before even seeing what you have...to let you know that we are the ones that get rich and not you. We are in the powerful position and so will dictate to you how you will benefit us, and the legal system in your country is set up to support us in this position. This is another reason why lawyers are for the rich. 

3) If you want to have some minimal benefit from your idea which may well make us much richer, which may earn us millions of dollars a year, hundreds of millions....then you can come and work for us, give us the idea and just earn a normal salary like everyone else in the lower subservient positions.

4) If we were to allow you sell us your idea at a reasonable price or long term ratio, can you imagine how this would alter the balance of fair distribution in society and within our own company? Can you imagine how many other people might try selling their ideas at a fair price, rather than being exploited, underpaid and undervalued? We can't have this.

5) We are telling you this without you even reading it, so that in the event of you sending us your idea...we want to make clear you wont get any money out of us, because it becomes our idea and our property.

6) In the event of you seeking to bring this idea about by yourself or through another small agent or manufacturer,  then know that we will quickly adopt it, copy it and produce it on a much higher level of production, marketing and distribution than you. We are so large, and the system is so tailored by banks, government and law...all of whom are in bed with us...that we have no worries about ideas from small individual creators, innovators and thinkers among the common people.

7) With all this is mind, and after absolving ourselves, freeing ourselves from any legal, financial or moral responsibility towards you...please feel free to give us your idea out of your commitment to us. There is a possibility we will acknowledge your submission and give you a free T-shirt, but probably not...even if you see your idea come to market shortly after your submission, as we will claim we already conceived it ourselves...just in case the our public profile is harmed by the publicity if you choose to make a fuss. Thank you our valued customer.

So there we have it, it is not really a case of them not wanting your idea...Rather a declaration that you wont be getting paid for it...because they and their buddies already own you.

Misguided Policy or Manipulation & Exploitation concerning health, commerce and freedom: Chocolate Bars and Fast Food

 Misguided Policy or Manipulation & Exploitation concerning  health, commerce and freedom: Chocolate Bars and Fast Food

Whilst buying a multi-pack deal of chocolate bars at a supermarket recently, on opening the packet, I noticed the deal was not as good as it first seemed to be, as the bars were small. I usually wouldn't have fallen for this, as being aware of these tricks, I feel the pack first to examine it (and find the wastage of packaging masking the reduced proportions inside...I guess the environmental responsibility claims are not as important as the health mantra deception). I have grown up with these bars and remember my father buying them for me on the way home from work. I didn't end up as a fat child due to this regular treat, as my parents did feed me more than chocolate bars, I did learn about nutrition, exercise, balanced diet, excessive eating, and dietary deficiencies at home, school and later in life as part of general education, experience and common sense.

However, I was not taught at school about economic exploitation under the guise of 'health' and excessive governmental interference in consumer and company choice under the guise of 'social and commercial responsibility'. I don't want my eating habits enforced on me. A gun doesn't kill someone, a human does and a chocolate bar doesn't make you fat, it is your use of it and the rest of your time.

When I buy a chocolate bar, I know roughly what I am buying, I know that it isn't supposed to be a health food or dietary staple. I am unaware of any traditional culture that advises abandoning the natural sources of fibre, minerals, vitamins, protein, complex carbohydrates and healthier fats while replacing them with manufactured confectionery. I am also unaware that the food manufacturers themselves ever offered such advice. The last time I checked human physiology and biological processes, it seemed that fats and sugars are bodily, biochemical, nutritional needs, they are not toxic alien invasions of the food chain. Yes, in excess, or without a balanced diet and exercise they may well contribute to a whole range of health issues, but this maybe the case with many things. As long as a manufacturer does not deceive the customer and advertise a product as serving a function it it does not, nor misrepresenting its content and nature, nor directly recommending harmful usage levels, then there should be no problem. You can after all, drink too much water, so will the government start rationing supplies on this basis? Should all desserts in restaurants be replaced with fruit salads, but only small ones due to the fructose sugar content?

To say there is too much sugar in a chocolate bar is a little like saying there is too much potato in chips. Perhaps the government and manufacturers need to be reminded "This is a CHOCOLATE BAR,it is not excessive calorific content...because, it is a CHOCOLATE BAR...this is what any rational person would expect of a chocolate bar." What reaction did they want? "Oh! We can't believe it, they have been putting sugar all this time in the chocolate bars?!" Perhaps this idiocy is an extension of the general dumbing down of the education system and swapping the original meanings of words for opposite meanings.

There should be freedom in the manufacturer's development of their selection of products, along with their sizes and ingredients unless directly harmful. Equally, there should be freedom from interference between the manufacturer, supplier, retailers and consumer in such transactions. We know the government will find this concept difficult as seeing as it already interferes with the oppressive usurping of 20% of each such transaction under the absurd misnomer of 'value added tax'...

If portion sizes are being reduced, somebody might end up eating more than they originally wanted, as they might buy two instead of one to fulfil their want. More importantly, if portion sizes are reduced then the price has to match the reduction otherwise this is exploiting and duping the customer under the dubious guise of "we are making you healthy." In reality a poorly concealed ruse to snatch more money for less product, a wicked collaboration of government and big business disguised as altruism and health policy. Indeed, if this new government-business collaboration is not sinister it is at least ludicrous and misguided. Sweets are treats and not meant to be the main-meal, no business is advocating eating their confectionery for breakfast, lunch and dinner.

If some people are irresponsible concerning their own health and diet or that of their children, then these people need assistance with education or decision making if that is their problem. The answer to this isn't to punish and restrict manufacturers and consumers for their normal behaviour and restricting their access to products that meet their needs, preferences or desires. We announce today that there are some irresponsible parents down your street who made their children sick with sweets and therefore to save you all, none you can any longer buy what you want! What happened to freedom of the market place, consumer choice, products that reflect the diverse needs and desires of the market? It seems the uniform social engineering (via media and education) extends to dietary engineering, maybe soya milk will replace dairy milk...not too far away from the apocalyptic nightmare invoked by the dystopian 1970's movie 'Soylent Green' (don't read any reviews or trailers before you watch it).

To announce that manufacturers will be forced into making their products more healthy, less calorific via reduction of portion sizes sounds like some parody of an Orwellian society or totalitarian joke. "We have made this chocolate bar healthier by giving you less!" This is like saying "A kilogram of sugar will no longer have the calorific content of a kilogram, because it will be reduced to 500grams!" But what if I want a kilogram? You have reduced the chocolate bar so it has less calories, but I am buying it because I want a full bar and perhaps the calories too, it is then up to me whether I eat it all now, share it or save some for later. So no matter who you are now, no matter what your needs, tastes and preferences are....no matter whether you are 7years old and two stone in weight or 30 years old, 6ft 5 and 14stone in weight, the government has decided that you will all have the same small chocolate bar. In another era this so called responsible partnership between government and manufacturers might be called communism, or something close to it. If there is so much concern for sugar and obesity and it's connection with chocolate bars, then why not restrict consumers to one bar a week or ban them altogether? Indeed such a measure would be ridiculous, but who is drawing these lines and on the basis of what?

This is all being done for us supposedly. Why not go one step further, as soon as I take one bite, snatch the bar off of me and give it to someone else then tell me you are doing it for my health and my character by making sure I am sharing with others. 

Along the same lines we have fast food retailers being forced to offer salads and health options. Well if they want to supply that then fine, but I don't go to a fast food restaurant necessarily for health reasons, I go because I desire what they are known for offering. If they can offer the same, for the same price, taste and texture but more healthily then very good, we are all winners. But if it is at the cost of taste and texture, then this is effectively the government saying "No more burger and chips for you...only wholemeal pasta and salads now." I am all for, burgers being offered in wholemeal buns, I think they will taste just as good, along with the garnish and sauces, but perhaps they will not sell so well, so no-one should be forced, we don't want more piles of wasted food. Will we be forced to have semi-skimmed milk? We don't want to get fat do we? I don't like semi-skimmed, I want milk as it was originally 'milked'...but it seems we are the ones getting milked!

What will be enforced next? Cars with only capacity for 50 miles worth of petrol? "We are doing good for the environment and your journey cost savings, you can only travel 50 miles at a time." It wouldn't be long before we expect to hear "We have removed all the frightening content from this horror movie so all sensitive characters can enjoy it."

If the government is so concerned with the health of people, then they should stop dropping bombs on people and stop promoting their exploitation with the facilitation and promotion of so called 'financial services' i.e. robbing people of their wealth via insurance and usurious banking, they can also stop robbing people of 30-50% of their income or wealth via the plethora of exorbitant taxes. There seems to be a lot less rules concerning consumer protection from the sale of gold bars than there are for chocolate bars.

Complaining about what you mandated yourself...Habitual Voters

Complaining about what you mandated yourself...Habitual Voters

The masses have been trained to think that voting matters, indeed it does matter, in maintaining the status quo. People keep on voting and the situation stays the same or gets worse, regardless of the political party or individuals in power.

When radical change is needed to remove endemic problems, minor administrative adjustments via elections, political establishment policy think tanks and committees will not do, not when the problems are fundamental, structural, ideological, systematic and intrinsic.

Almost all the people are complaining about what sort of society we are living in but equally almost all of the people fail to see the link between their habitual actions and that which they are complaining about.

Too much tax? Indeed there are too many taxes and their levels are way too high, astronomically high. The level of tax each individual pays is excessive and oppressive, yet people keep voting for all the parties that are more or less agreed upon maintaining those levels of taxation. The result is the vast majority of people stay where they are, crippled and shackled by a combination of taxation, rent, high prices, low pay and exorbitant energy bills. People are complaining about this but keep voting for it.

Education has been dumbed down, relativised, diluted and manipulated so it has become almost meaningless, worthless and saturated in the dominant secular monoculture, yet people keep voting for those who engineer it and collaborate with its authors and ratify its implementation.

Crime is not punished, justice is not implemented, criminality is not deterred nor its various causes prevented, yet people keep voting for the architects and facilitators of such destructive traits and conditions.

A degenerate and corrosive culture pervades the fashion, music, movie and television industries. It permeates all areas of society at all levels and sullies human relations and moral and intellectual growth, polluting families, communities and individuals. Yet again, the people continue to vote for the progenitors of such culture while complaining about its consequences.

People are being bombed, murdered and tortured around the world, women and children killed, maimed, their houses ruined, their families wiped out...yet people keep voting for those who sanctioned and orchestrated it.

It is either stupidity, insanity or masochism to continuously support a situation whilst hating it, suffering due to it and complaining about it. If you don't like the way things are, then stop performing the actions that maintain it.

People have become so ludicrously gullible, unthinking and unanalytical that they fall for every new ruse and stratagem used to maintain their support. They consider that things will be different this time with the election of a 'younger candidate', a 'black candidate', an 'asian candidate', a 'female candidate' or a party with a new name and a new slogan...Yet all of these surface variations operating under the same structures, ideology, education, motives, collaborators and overseers bring about no needed change. In fact these cosmetic variables are used to further promote a sinister agenda whilst the masses are diverted by the supposed mirroring of demographics. How naive, shallow, indoctrinated and deluded can the people be? Poison is still poison even if it is renamed, repackaged and recoloured.

The largest political group concerning vote statistics in the UK general election are non-voters (those who don't trust or agree with either the mainstream political parties, policies, candidates, system or ideology). 

This largest group of non-voters is never represented in mainstream education or media. It would cause too many people to think and act differently if they had someone elucidating the reasons why voting is the wrong thing to do and why the existing political structures and ideas are exploitative, oppressive, deceptive and injurious.

They take the political decision not to vote for any number of good motives whether social, economic, political, moral, religious etc. They may see that the interests and well-being of themselves, their families and neighbours, their countries and the wider world are not best served by supporting liars, frauds, cheats, murderers, thieves, schemers and manipulators in elevating their own status at the expense of everyone and everything else. Perhaps it is time you finally woke up and joined them...the non-voters that is.

BRIDGE THEORY - An Introduction

BRIDGE THEORY - An Introduction [11th March 2015]

Bridge theory is a method of observation, analysis, logistical planning, problem solving, creative expansion and organized development.

That is a long description and perhaps it is still deficient. This is because bridge theory is an encompassing concept which operates on many levels in many spheres.

Bridge theory is a physical and conceptual reality, it thus includes theoretical or ideational knowledge and practical applicability. i.e. it is something you can build upon in your mind and with your hands in your living environment, you can analyze imaginary bridge-systems in your mind or view your whole reality and environment through the prism of bridge-theory.

Bridge theory is based on the idea that almost everything in the universe is a bridge or fundamentally connected to the bridge-form in nature. In short, bridge theory states that things can be fall into one or more of the following categories:-

1) a bridge

2) a terminal/location between bridges

3) a traverse medium (the substance, matter, material, energy, environment, conditions through, around or over which a bridge passes)

4) a bridge walker (the information, energy, matter, individual, group or entity which traverses ('walks') the bridge.

These pillars or designations can exist in the same concept, individual or entity such that something can simultaneously be a a bridge and a bridge-walker, or a bridge and a traverse medium, or a terminal and a bridge etc.

Bridge theory due to it being a pervasive principle can apply in all fields and areas of life whether economic, social, scientific, psychological, educational, political, religious, philosophical, artistic etc.

Bridge Theory rests on rational and observational deductions made from the reality of bridges concerning their design, structure, functions and attributes. The deeper and wider this analysis and the more accurate the classification of its components and states the more accurate, detailed and useful will be any working analogy, understanding or application derived from it.

Some of the fundamental principles of bridge theory include:-

1) A bridge is a connection between two entities, systems, components, attributes, individuals, groups or ideas. This generally exists between two places of distinguished locations and/or attributes. However, moments in time are bridged even if there is apparently no movement or change in a given subject (although in reality change has occurred at some or various levels).

2) A bridge facilitates exchange, movement, association, perception, travel between the two locations or states.

3) A bridge is a fundamental structure, reality and process in the universe. This means that everything is connected to bridges in some form either as a bridge, terminal (locations that are connected by bridges) or a 'bridge walker' that which crosses or traverses a bridge.

4) Events, matters, ideas, objects and reality are better viewed via the filter or spectacle of bridge theory because it is an accurate classification of the reality. It expands the vision and analysis to interrelationships, causes and effects, origins and developments, goals and methods.

5) A subject, entity, attribute, system or concept is understood by bridge searching, bridge viewing, bridge building and bridge walking. This means that connections are made to a subject, environment and it's relationships and connections are searched for within it and linking it to other subjects external to its own system or structure. Past, present, future and potential connections and bridges are relevant. Locations are relevant, structures, components and organization are relevant. The flows of matter, energy and information are also relevant.

6) Bridges lead to bridges.

[This is an important initial marker in a new theory I have discovered/developed. I am writing a book on it and if you just reflect on these few introductory words you will see it is of vast significance and universal resonance.]

Zayd Depaor

When it's hot I wanna be cold & when it's cold I wanna be hot

When it's hot I wanna be cold & when it's cold I wanna be hot

In summer with the sun blazing down direct or through the window and fan not cooling me enough, I'm thinking, "I'm looking forward to winter so I can get on with my work, without being overheated." Winter comes and then I'm often so cold I have to keep warming my hands so I can type, I'm thinking "At least in summer I can do some work outside, sit down without getting wet (if it hasn't rained) and not have to jump up and down to keep warm, roll on summer."

So in one condition I want the opposite and when the opposite arrives I want to return to where I was, the original opposite.

I think this shows two things (at least). One, envisioning is not the same as tasting and two, you can't escape problems as life is full of them.

People on a regular basis hope for different conditions whose absence, in their mind is the cause of their problems and discomfort. In reality however, every situation has its challenges. This doesn't mean though that a change in circumstances can't make a difference to your performance, of course a change can make a dramatic difference. However, it will only be you in that new environment you hope for, so if you don't have the internal provisions then you may starve in your new home, earlier than expected. It is indeed wise to prepare to be a 'man for all seasons', as we are in a changing world with every moment having its pros, cons and trials, just as the Qura'n says "Every soul will taste death. And We test you with evil and with good as trial and to Us you will be returned" (THE QURA'N al Anbiyaa' [The Prophets] 21:35)

Holes in the Finances - 10 Rules to Avoid Squandering your Wealth

Holes in the Finances
Ten Rules to Avoid Squandering your Wealth

1) Don't get into businesses you don't understand...you might only gain some understanding of them once they have swallowed your fortune.

2) Don't get into businesses you are no good at...a pat on the back from your pal and a like from your girlfriend on Facebook might not cut it in the real world.

3) Don't get involved with agents you don't know...they might be here today, gone tomorrow...with your money.

4) Don't store your wealth in volatile worthless currency, instead convert it into real wealth, commodities, gold etc. Something that has value in itself is better than something given artificial value by the manipulations of government and central banks.

5) Don't put all your eggs in one basket, baskets of eggs often fall to the ground...leaving you with no eggs for eggs and no eggs for pancakes.

6) Don't go telling everyone your ideas before you hatched them...people have a knack of taking your ideas and then claiming they are their own when the dollar signs register on their eyeballs.

7) Take note of your real friends in the stage of poverty and weakness...In the stage of strength and riches, your friend list seems to grow along with your bills.

8) Make sure your spouse married you before you got rich...if this needs explaining then you obviously never read celebrity news.

9) Make sure you live in the right country...somehow people have been mind controlled into accepting the principle that half your wealth belongs to the government, some governments are better than others but they all seem to be thieves operating an exploitation racket.

10) Don't waste your money on a whole load of stupid expensive things you don't need....if you really needed them, you would have died before you became rich.

Death at the Door - 27th August 2014

Death at the Door

Death is knocking at the door,
Don't want to let him in,
He wants less but I want more,
He knows about my sin.

Death is knocking at the door,
No place for me to hide,
I once felt rich, but now I'm poor,
He's soon to break inside.

Death is knocking at the door,
I can't resist, I can't delay,
I'm second best in this short war,
I'll soon receive my pay.

(Zayd Depaor - 27th August 2014, 6:46am)